MEL & Impact Framework
Indicator catalogue aligned to WHH's impact levels — outputs, intermediate outcomes, higher-level outcomes and systemic outcomes — with data quality, baseline/endline and evaluation readiness.
WHH impact levels
From activities delivered to systemic change
Activities delivered: CBOs, villages profiled, trainees, water bodies
Adoption: diet diversity, kitchen gardens, scheme access
Wellbeing: stunting trend, income proxies, water access
Institutions: government convergence, partner capability, policy
Indicators tracked
9
On track
5
Data quality risks
2
Avg evidence score
76
Indicator catalogue
Aligned to impact levels with evidence scores
| Indicator | Target | Verified | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| FHFI households covered | 42,725 households | 38,940 verified | On track |
| Stunting reduction trend | 8.3 percentage points | 6.1 pp verified | Watching |
| CBOs empowered | 900+ CBOs | 764 digitally profiled | On track |
| Nutrition Smart Villages profiled | 512 profiled | 2026-12-15 | On track |
| Diet diversity improvement | 3.8 average | 2026-12-15 | Watching |
| Water bodies restored or monitored | 74 verified | 2026-08-31 | On track |
| FPOs with PGS readiness | 38 active records | 2026-11-20 | Watching |
| Green skills trainees verified | 1815 verified | 2026-09-15 | On track |
| Government interface actions resolved | 54 percent resolved | 2026-09-30 | At risk |
Data-quality & evaluation risks
Open issues affecting evidence strength
MEL Quality Agent — data review
2 high-priority data-quality risks: inconsistent partner monitoring formats (12 of 30+ standardised) and the ageing stunting survey. Hold systemic-outcome claims until partner indicators are harmonised and anthropometry is refreshed.